Print There is a spectrum of views about how religion and ethics are related—from the view that religion is the absolute bedrock of ethics to one that holds that ethics is based on humanistic assumptions justified mainly, and sometimes only, by appeals to reason. These two extremes tend to be argued in a way that offers little room for compromise or pragmatic solutions to real issues we face everyday.
Deist Novice June 2, at First, who was Joseph of Arimathea. Finally, with the multitude of Virgn Mary and Jesus sightings in clouds, food, stained glass,etc, how can Craig rely on this stuff as irrefutable evidence.
Carrier actually had Craig on the ropes but refuse to rough him up with his mass hysteria thesis whcih I thought was effective. Of all the people that I have heard Craig debate, he showed Erhman the most respect. I was disappointed that Erhman did not use his encyclopedic knowledge of scripture to neutralize any of the famous four points.
Finally, why are there not more attacks on the virgin birth. Is it that both sides pretty much agree that it is the result of an embarrassing translation error?
I think I heard Barker use this but it seems to never come up Again, good list and good web site. Ranzo June 4, at 3: Now I would like you a question regarding your opinion that William Lane Craig has won most of his debates with atheists. The fact that he says repeatedly does not make it true.
Also in every debate he presents his religious experience as not being proof that god exists but at the same time he says that people should not think too much and ask too many questions about existence of god since that might prevent them from experiencing god and finding the truth.
That is logically incoherent.
Also at the end of every debate he uses his final remarks by saying to people that they should seek personal experience with Jesus and that is the only was they can know that god truly exists. I can see that you live in America and from what I have read Americans are the most Christian nation in the western world.
You are probably used to reverends like Fred Phelps who claim that god sends floods because gays live in that town. From that stage Craig is probably an improvement. I myself am a Bosnian refugee living Denmark because of the religious war in my country. The Danish people are the least religious of all westerners.
Also in every other debate he repeats the same things. At the same time he says that there are universal morals because people all over the world have somewhat same moral values.
Ergo there is no need for his god. He uses circular logic all the time. He also says that we can not judge gods commands to kill people which is written in the bible because we are not in position to judge god by our human standards. At the same time he uses the human standards to point out the fact that there is a god and so on.
Can you explain it further? English is my third language so sorry if there some grammar mistakes in what I have written. Debates are not going to be what decide my beliefs, though they help to inform my beliefs. Deist Novice June 5, at 8: Well I downloaded that debate hoping to hear soemone really take it to Craig.
Stenger is a retired physicist so he could talk credibly about th holes in the causality argument that Craig uses. However something incredible happened. Even in the question and answer periond, Stenger muffed a softball tossed on the Virgin Birth.
On the other hand John Shelby Spong acquitted himself rather well.
I could be mistaken but I thought I heard Craig agree thaPaul was talking about a Spiritual resurrection in the infamous Corinthians 15 passage which would be an astonishing admission fro an evangelical. I would be interested to read your impressions of the CRaig Song debate. All in all a masterful performanc by Spong.
Tobias June 10, at What have you tried?Morality (from Latin: moralis, lit. 'manner, character, proper behavior') is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper.
Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion or culture, or it can derive from a . The best short definition I've heard, courtesy of my friend Stirling, is that morals are how you treat people you know.
Ethics are how you treat people you don't know.
Your morality is what makes you a good wife or husband, dad or mother. A good daughter or son. A good friend. Even a good employee or. Does Ethics Require Religion? By James A. Donahue | March 1, Print; Bookmark; There is a spectrum of views about how religion and ethics are related—from the view that religion is the absolute bedrock of ethics to one that holds that ethics is based on humanistic assumptions justified mainly, and sometimes only, by appeals to reason.
There is quite a bit to unpack in your comments. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all share the old testament and a belief in God. God is defined as the intelligent designer of the entire universe, omniscient, omnipotent, omni-benevolent, omnipresent.
It was once the case that New Religious Movements were considered to be a symptom of social problems. Now the tide has turned, and much of the world has now come to consider religion in general to be the cause of social malaise alphabetnyc.com such as William James defend religion by saying that it is merely human behaviour that causes problems 2, however, despite the sure progress of humankind .
Shayara Bano Vs. Union of India and others [Writ Petition (C) No. of ] In Re: Muslim Women's Quest for Equality Vs. Jamiat Ulma-I-Hind.